	author:	Fergal Sheil	institution:	International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ)	¿porque no los dos?
	tl;dr	An ICIJ report says alleged cartel figure Daniel Kinahan was arrested in Dubai and has now been charged in Ireland after being extradited under high security. The article recounts Kinahan’s reported role in the “Kinahan cartel,” U.S. sanctions and accusations of large-scale drug trafficking and money laundering, and notes he has denied wrongdoing. It mentions other suspects and related investigations, and places the case in the broader context of transnational drug smuggling networks and financial flows.
	deeper:	The piece is largely straight news, relying on attributed claims (Irish authorities, court proceedings, prior U.S. sanctions announcements, and earlier reporting). Language like “alleged” appears repeatedly, and denials are included, which reduces slant. Some framing is implicitly prosecutorial because most available facts come from law enforcement and court filings, and there’s limited detail on defense arguments beyond denials. Overall quality is strong: clear timeline, relevant context, and careful attribution; it could be stronger with more direct quotations from legal filings and fuller defense-side detail.
media:

	author:	Unknown	institution:	International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ)	¿porque no los dos?
	tl;dr	An investigative report describes Kazakhstan’s claims that corruption involving major oil companies and contractors influenced the awarding and execution of contracts tied to the Kashagan oil project, contributing to roughly $10.7 billion in disputed costs and delays. The story relies on court/arbitration filings and leaked/obtained documents to outline alleged bribery, questionable procurement practices, and a long-running legal fight between Kazakhstan and a consortium of international firms. It frames the dispute as a high-stakes test of accountability in global extractive projects.
	deeper:	The tone is skeptical of oil-company contracting and emphasizes alleged misconduct, which can tilt framing toward wrongdoing even where claims are not yet proven in court. However, it appears grounded in documented legal proceedings (arbitration/court filings) and provides concrete figures, timelines, and named entities, which supports credibility. Quality is strong for sourcing and detail, but readers should note that key assertions are allegations from an adversarial legal dispute and may benefit from more prominent counterpoints or full responses from all parties.
media:

	author:	Nicole Sadek	institution:	International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ)	¿porque no los dos?
	tl;dr	An ICIJ report says India is tightening “track and trace” rules for cancer drugs after a counterfeit Keytruda scandal exposed how high prices and scarcity can be exploited. New requirements include mandatory QR codes and unit-level identifiers (e.g., unique code, manufacture/expiry dates, manufacturer details) for medicines sold in India, including some imports. The story cites Health Ministry statements, prior investigations with The Indian Express, and a 2024 case in New Delhi involving refilled vials and cross-border impacts (including Nepal).
	deeper:	The piece is largely factual and specific (dates, agencies, prior case details, and described regulatory changes). Its framing emphasizes patient harm, high pricing, and public-interest accountability—common in investigative health reporting—without heavy ideological rhetoric. It relies on official sources and earlier documented investigations, but offers limited space for countervailing views from manufacturers or enforcement challenges beyond brief mentions (e.g., “foolproof” concerns). Overall, it is clear, well-sourced, and informative.
media:

	author:	Sylvia Alecci	institution:	International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ)	¿porque no los dos?
	tl;dr	An ICIJ article reports Taiwan’s Justice Ministry Investigation Bureau has charged four executives tied to a local firm, allegedly used by China-linked cyber operators, for assisting in espionage targeting ICIJ and Citizen Lab. The piece says the campaign involved phishing emails, fake “cooperation invitations,” and possibly malware delivery aimed at journalists, NGOs, and officials. It notes Citizen Lab’s findings on suspicious emails and suggests some content may have been generated with little oversight, while framing the operation as directed by China’s military intelligence.
	deeper:	The reporting is largely evidence-driven (official Taiwanese statements, prior Citizen Lab research, and ICIJ’s firsthand experiences). It uses assertive language about Chinese direction, but attributes key claims to authorities and researchers rather than presenting them as pure fact. Limited space is given to responses from accused parties or Chinese authorities, which slightly narrows perspective. Overall structure, sourcing, and specificity are strong, though some allegations depend on intelligence/attribution that readers can’t independently verify.
media:

International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ)